For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a pal - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, christianpedia.com the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to widen his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative functions should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their models, pipewiki.org unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best performing markets on the vague pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their material, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public data from a wide range of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.